PIV Measurements of Metallic Powders Produced by Liquid Metal Atomization Using de Laval Nozzle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Liquid metal atomization using de Laval nozzle is an established technique for producing fine (< 100 μm) metal powders for a lot of industrial applications. This process offers a variety of advantages as spherical morphology or low consumption of inert gas for example. Despite its widespread uses, however, the relationships among gas dynamics melt nozzle and de Laval nozzle diameters, processing parameters, and particle size remain defined. As a result, efforts to reduce powder costs by improving particle size control and energy efficiency remain hindered. Then, the optimization of this process is a great challenge. This experimental study examines the atomizing spray behavior depending on the process parameters. Experiments were conducted on copper (at 99.9%). Particle Image Velocimetry technique was implemented in the atomization chamber and measurements were performed to characterize in velocity the atomized droplets. The PIV system was placed in such a way that the atomization zone, comprised between 50 and 110 mm downstream the de Laval nozzle exit, can be monitored by the camera. The evolutions of the particle velocity and particle sizes were finally analyzed versus the working conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".