MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296955334 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a9e

Accretion Burst Echoes as Probes of Protostellar Environments and Episodic Mass Assembly

2022· article· en· W4296955334 on OpenAlexaff
Logan Francis, Doug Johnstone, Jeong‐Eun Lee, Gregory J. Herczeg, Feng Long, Steve Mairs, Carlos Contreras Peña, G. H. Moriarty‐Schieven

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsProtostarAstrophysicsAccretion (finance)Light curveAmplitudeEnvelope (radar)AstronomyLuminosityStar formationStarsOpticsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Protostars likely accrete material at a highly time-variable rate, but measurements of accretion variability from the youngest protostars are rare, as they are still deeply embedded within their envelopes. Submillimeter/millimeter observations can trace the thermal response of dust in the envelope to accretion luminosity changes, allowing variations in the accretion rate to be quantified. In this paper, we present contemporaneous submillimeter/millimeter light curves of variable protostars in Serpens Main, as observed by the ALMA Atacama Compact Array (ACA), the Submillimeter Array (SMA), and the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT). The most recent outburst of EC 53 (V371 Ser), an ∼18 month periodic variable, is well sampled in the SMA and JCMT observations. The SMA light curve of EC 53 is observed to peak weeks earlier and exhibit a stronger amplitude than at the JCMT. Stochastic variations in the ACA observations are detected for SMM 10 IR, with an amplitude a factor of ∼2 greater than that seen by the JCMT. We develop a toy model of the envelope response to accretion outbursts to show that EC 53's light curves are plausibly explained by the delay associated with the light travel time across the envelope and the additional dilution of the JCMT response, due to the incorporation of cold envelope material in the beam. The larger JCMT beam can also wash out the response to rapid variations, which may be occurring for SMM 10 IR. Our work thus provides a valuable proof of concept for the use of submillimeter/millimeter observations as a means of probing both the underlying accretion luminosity variations and the protostellar environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→