Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusions have very similar angiographic appearance on CT-angiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the angiographic appearance of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid near-occlusion. We have found no such previous study. The study hypothesis was that among symptomatic patients with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis, near-occlusion is more common and near-occlusions are more severe than among asymptomatic persons with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis. We reassessed consecutive CTAs from 4042 persons, 645 had ≥ 50% carotid stenosis, and 385 (60%) symptomatic. Near-occlusion was similarly common in symptomatic (105, 27%) and asymptomatic (56, 24%) cases. Among near-occlusions, the angiographic appearance was very similar between symptomatic and asymptomatic cases: mean stenosis lumen diameter (0.7 mm), distal ICA diameter (2.1 mm), and ECA ratio (0.79) were the same in both groups. Mean ICA ratio (0.46 and 0.48) and share of full collapse was very similar (45% and 42%). These findings add to the pathophysiological understanding of carotid near-occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".