(NZW × BXSB) F1 male mice: An unusual, severe and fatal mouse model of lupus erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune/inflammatory disease. The heterogeneity and complexity of clinical presentation has made it challenging to study or treat this syndrome. The (NZW×BXSB) F1 lupus-prone male mouse model of this disease is potentially useful to study mechanism and treatment modalities, but there is a lack of information about this model's characterization and disease progression. Therefore, the aim was to examine this lupus model's physical/clinical disease presentation and its immunological status. Materials and methods: Clinical and physical status were observed in 8- and 16-week-old male and female (± 1 week) (NZW/LacJ x BXSB/MpJ) F1 mice (n = 8 per group). Young males (8 ± 1 week) without disease and female (16 ± 1 week) mice served as controls. Physical changes, quantitative values of autoantibodies, and blood cell parameters were determined. Necropsy and post-mortem histopathology were also performed. Results: With aging (≥ 12 weeks), significant increases in severe abdominal distension/swelling, inability to walk, paleness of paws and significant weight increase were observed compared to controls (p < 0.05). The necropsy examination showed abdominal distension associated with serous effusion and histological examination identified severe edema and multi-organ abnormalities (spleen, lymph nodes, and kidney). Significant increases in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) was seen in old/sick compared to female (p = 0.0002) or young male (p = 0.0036) mice. Old mice developed immune thrombocytopenia compared to female (p = 0.0056) and young male (p = 0.0007) mice. Anti-platelet was detectable in old, sick mice. The mortality rate increased with aging; more than 35% of male mice died during this study between the ages of 13-18 weeks. Conclusion: We found that the (NZW/LacJ x BXSB/MpJ) F1 male mice spontaneously exhibit, over varying lengths of time, extremely severe and fatal clinical disease symptoms. This model may be too severe to be helpful in investigating SLE and testing potential treatment modalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".