MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297025413 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2022.10.10.16

Severe Grief Tied to Experiencing, Witnessing Overdose

2022· article· en· W4297025413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terri D’Arrigo

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriefContext (archaeology)Complicated griefPsychiatryDisenfranchised griefHarmDrug overdoseHarm reductionPsychologyMedicineOpioid overdosePoison controlPublic healthMedical emergencyNursingSocial psychologyOpioidHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & ResearchFull AccessSevere Grief Tied to Experiencing, Witnessing OverdoseTerri D'ArrigoTerri D'ArrigoSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Sep 2022https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2022.10.10.16AbstractRepeated exposure to overdose events has a cumulative effect on how people who use illicit substances feel grief in response to loss.Experiencing or witnessing multiple overdose events is associated with severe grief among people who inject drugs, a study in Drug and Alcohol Dependence has found.Repeated exposure to overdose events can shape how people who use illicit substances understand the world and violate their sense of safety, says Kathleen S. Kenny, Ph.D.“We know that grief can have significant deleterious effects, and we wanted to understand how it was being experienced by people in the context of the opioid overdose crisis and its unceasing onslaught of overdose deaths and near deaths,” lead author Kathleen S. Kenny, Ph.D., told Psychiatric News. She is a Canadian Institutes of Health Research postdoctoral fellow at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy in the Department of Community Health Sciences at the University of Manitoba. “A main takeaway from the study is that cumulative, rather than single, overdose events were associated with severity of responses to grief and loss.”Kenny and colleagues examined data from a survey of 244 people who injected drugs in four community-based harm reduction programs in Toronto. Participants were 16 years of age or older and had injected drugs in the past three months. The researchers defined three types of overdose events: the participant’s own overdose, an overdose witnessed by the participant, and the overdose death of a person important to the participant. They then asked whether participants agreed with seven statements about how they were affected by overdose-related losses. The statements included “I feel like I’ve lost parts of myself,” “I feel like life has really changed,” “I feel like things I use to cope don’t help anymore,” “I feel numbed out,” “I’m not sure how to make sense of all the losses I’ve experienced,” “I feel angry,” and “I feel like I’ve lost a lot of my community.” The participants who answered “yes” to a higher number of statements were considered to have more severe responses to grief and loss.Among all participants, 28.7% reported two or more personal overdoses of their own, 70.9% witnessed two or more overdoses in other people, and 28.3% had experienced the loss of two or more people important to them in the previous six months. The researchers found that participants who experienced two or more personal overdoses, witnessed one overdose in someone else, or witnessed two or more overdoses in other people had the greatest likelihood of having severe responses to grief and loss. Severe responses were also more common among participants who were exposed to all three types of overdose events (their own overdose, overdose in other people, and overdose death in other people).Psychiatrists should be careful not to overlook a patient’s grief, even as they seek to treat the patient’s substance use disorder, says Frances R. Levin, M.D.Columbia UniversityKenny said that the results suggest that multiple, repeat exposure to overdose events may lead to a disrupted assumptive world among people who use drugs.“People’s core beliefs around everyday functioning, understanding of the world, and sense of safety are violated due to the continued, repeated experience of overdoses in their own lives, and the unrelenting loss of people in their communities to overdose,” Kenny explained.Frances R. Levin, M.D., the Kennedy-Leavy Professor of Psychiatry at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and chief of the Division on Substance Use Disorders at New York State Psychiatric Institute at Columbia, stressed the need for psychiatrists to create space in which patients who use drugs or have substance use disorder may grieve their losses.“When someone comes in for treatment, we tend to focus on treating the addiction, but it’s important not to overlook the patient’s grief,” said Levin, who was not involved in the research. “Explore with them what they’ve experienced, how they’ve experienced it, and how they have tried to cope with it, and provide support in handling their grief.”This study was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. One of the researchers is also supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C. ■Resources“Frequency of Fatal and Non-Fatal Overdoses and Response to Grief and Loss Among People Who Inject Drugs: An Unexplored Dimension of the Opioid Overdose Crisis” ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207