MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297056176 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24597

Bypass control of heat exchanger network under uncertainty

2022· article· en· W4297056176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetpointHeat exchangerControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlCollocation (remote sensing)Temperature controlDiscretizationWork (physics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsControl engineeringControl (management)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dynamic control of the heat exchanger network is important for developing energy‐efficient and safe industrial processes. In such a system, the control is achieved through the bypass stream around the heat exchanger. This work aims to track the setpoint temperature of the mixed stream by manipulating the bypass fraction of the cold stream around the heat exchanger. The implemented control is in a non‐linear model predictive control (NMPC) framework. The first‐principles model of a shell and a tube heat exchanger is used. The orthogonal collocation technique is used to discretize the first‐principles model into the system of algebraic equations. In this work, uncertainty is also considered in the inlet temperature of the hot stream. The uncertain optimal control problem is dealt with by using a scenario tree‐based approximation along with the affine policy‐based method. The results show that, under different scenarios of uncertainty, the controlled variable efficiently tracks the setpoint. In comparison, considering the same scenarios of uncertainty used, the deterministic optimization approach shows significant deviation in the controlled variable from the setpoint as time passes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it