Restricted Isometry Property in Quantized Network Coding of Sparse\n Messages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study joint network coding and distributed source coding of\ninter-node dependent messages, with the perspective of compressed sensing.\nSpecifically, the theoretical guarantees for robust $\\ell_1$-min recovery of an\nunder-determined set of linear network coded sparse messages are investigated.\nWe discuss the guarantees for $\\ell_1$-min decoding of quantized network coded\nmessages, using the proposed local network coding coefficients in \\cite{naba},\nbased on Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) of the resulting measurement\nmatrix. Moreover, the relation between tail probability of $\\ell_2$-norms and\nsatisfaction of RIP is derived and used to compare our designed measurement\nmatrix, with i.i.d. Gaussian measurement matrix. Finally, we present our\nnumerical evaluations, which shows that the proposed design of network coding\ncoefficients result in a measurement matrix with an RIP behavior, similar to\nthat of i.i.d. Gaussian matrix.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".