MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297092377 · doi:10.3917/rlc.381.0053

Une double existence : le cas étrange des deux Jekyll français

2022· article· fr· W4297092377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine Ashley

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de littérature comparée · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article trace l’histoire des deux premières traductions françaises du roman Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886) de Robert Louis Stevenson et fait valoir les raisons historico-littéraires qui font que cette histoire de doubles incontestablement ancrée dans une tradition littéraire écossaise fut en mesure de remplir des rôles très distincts dans l’histoire littéraire française. L’article démontre que la traduction de Jules-Paul Tardivel, publiée au Québec en 1887- 1888, découle d’un débat sur la moralité religieuse à la fin du dix-neuvième siècle, tandis que la traduction de Mme Berthe Lowe, publiée par Plon en 1890, participe à un débat sur la modernité artistique à un moment où le champ littéraire français était en pleine crise esthétique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de littérature comparéeSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207