Evaluation of effect of moisture on fatigue performance of pavement designed with recycled asphalt mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The moisture resistance of dense- and gap-graded bituminous mixes prepared with the replacement of virgin aggregates and fresh bitumen with reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) was evaluated using indirect tensile strength (ITS) and resilient modulus ( M r ). The mechanistic analysis was performed to estimate the effect of moisture resistance on the fatigue performance of thin and thick pavement sections designed with dense- and gap-graded bituminous mixes. The ITS ratio and M r ratio results indicate that the resilient modulus ratio is more sensitive to moisture damage in bituminous mixes than the ITS ratio. In addition, the results of the fatigue life ratio indicated that the gap-graded mix prepared with different RAP content has better resistance to moisture-related cracking in thick pavement sections than the dense-graded mix. However, the effectiveness of gap-graded and dense-graded mixes prepared with different RAP content on moisture-related cracking depended on the subgrade strength for thin pavement sections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".