Initial Propulsion System Study for the Futuristic Hyperloop Transportation System: Design, Modeling, and Hardware in the Loop Verification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the proposal for a futuristic mode of transportation known as the Hyperloop has been popularized. Currently, there are only some reports regarding the design of the Hyperloop. More specifically, reports regarding the propulsion system design methodology for Hyperloop is minimal. Thus, this paper provides an initial steppingstone to modeling and simulation study for the propulsion system in a Hyperloop. The main contribution of this study is to provide a relatively simple design methodology for any future Hyperloop endeavors. This is shown using state of the art simulators to aid in designing the propulsion system. The design revolves around the linear synchronous motor based on field-oriented control through a three – phase inverter. PSIM is used to develop the model and design the full power system and controller. This includes the DC-DC converter, battery system model, three – phase inverter, and the motor controller. The motor used for modelling is a rotary permanent magnet synchronous motor. Finally, hardware in the loop technology is used to verify and validate the design. The controller design is tested through a Texas Instrument digital signal processor. The real time verification shows matching results with the offline simulation model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".