False Data Injection Attacks on Smart Grid Voltage Regulation With Stochastic Communication Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and advent of bidirectional chargers, EV aggregators, such as charging stations, will become a major player in electricity markets, providing voltage regulation (VR) or other services. We present a novel and practical VR scheme that takes advantage of the charging flexibility of EVs in charging stations that are connected to buses in a distribution grid. This VR scheme relies on real-time measurements, as well as estimates of the distribution system state and regulation capacity of each charging station. We then propose a novel false data injection attack against the VR capacity estimation process that exploits the uncertainty in EV mobility and network conditions. We show the attack vector with the largest expected adverse impact is the solution of a stochastic optimization problem, subject to a constraint that ensures it bypasses bad data detection. We determine this attack vector by solving a sequence of convex quadratically constrained linear programs. The case studies examined in a cosimulation platform, based on two standard test feeders, reveal the vulnerability of the VR capacity estimation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".