Thalidomide combined with endoscopy in the treatment of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare non-hereditary disease with a poor prognosis and a mortality rate of up to 55%. Currently, there is no standard treatment for CCS. The department of gastroenterology of our hospital admitted a patient with CCS whose symptoms improved significantly after treatment with thalidomide combined with endoscopy, and there was no obvious adverse reaction during the 2-year follow-up. CASE SUMMARY: A 47-year-old Chinese man presented with diarrhea for more than 4 mo, accompanied by loss of taste, fatigue, and weight loss. Physical examination demonstrated that the patient's skin and hands were hyperpigmented, the front edges of the nails of both hands were notably thickened and yellow, and the nails were partially atrophied. Gastrointestinal endoscopy identified a diffuse polypoid bulge, and the patient bore an albumin level of 27.3 g/L. The level of the calcium correction amount was (2.164 mM) which allowed for a comprehensive diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome, combined with hypoalbuminemia and hypocalcemia. Thalidomide of 150 mg per day was administered to regulate immunity, and the symptoms were relieved after 1 wk. During the follow-up period, polyps were still found that had not been resolved by thalidomide treatment, and endoscopic therapy was performed. This resulted in further improvement of his condition and no particular discomfort during the 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The patient's symptoms were significantly relieved by thalidomide 2 years after treatment, proposing it as a potential treatment for CCS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".