MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ties that Bind: Slavery and Colonialism

2022· book-chapter· en· W4297132436 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terri E. Givens

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocideColonialismIndigenousCapitalismEmpirePolitical economyPolitical scienceHistoryEthnologySociologyDevelopment economicsCriminologyLawEconomicsPoliticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American and European countries have been reckoning with their pasts of slavery and genocide. Formal apologies have been made for the treatment of indigenous peoples, Africans and others who were murdered, killed by disease, enslaved and pushed off of their land in the name of capitalism and empire. In this chapter, I examine colonialism and slavery as the beginnings of the bonds that would tie together the United States (and to some extent, Canada) and Europe in developing a long-lasting approach to the world that would create a divide between “Whites” and others. These ideas are still impacting the policies and discrimination faced by these groups today as they have tried to find their place in these societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207