3 DIMENSIONS OF ANIMATION IN SUPPORTING THE STUDENT INFORMATION PROCESSING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is a breakthrough in supporting students’ sd, SMP, AND high school in the SouthGarut in performing information processing of learning both for the exact and social. The study tries toanswer the question of how large the focus of information-processing speed of the student learningbased on element formation 3dimensi animation on the exact and social subjects (IPS). The study wasconducted on students at elementary, junior high, and high school. The study was conducted by usingthe method of research and development carried out experiments in which this research is consideringthe second year in which the CAI instructional model and formation animation 3dimensi been designedbefore. The study was conducted at the elementary school level, junior high, and high school located inthe southern Garut, with through stratified random sampling. The results showed that the speed ofinformation processing of learning both exact and social groups (IPS) conducted junior high schoolstudents were more superior than the elementary or high school students, through Computer AssistedInstruction teaching model loaded with animation 3dimensi formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".