MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297145728 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.0009

Teaching As La-Ing: Thinking About the English Lit and Creative Writing Classroom on Turtle Island

2020· article· en· W4297145728 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sonnet L’Abbé

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphorPraisePoetryLiteratureNarrativeCreative writingReading (process)HindiSociologyHistoryVisual artsPsychologyArtLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teaching As La-Ing: Thinking About the English Lit and Creative Writing Classroom on Turtle Island Sonnet L’Abbé (bio) Huy ch q’a siem hwulmuxw mustimuxw. Noor hindi opens her poem, “Fuck Your Lecture On Craft, My People Are Dying,” with a confrontation: “Colonizers write about flowers. / I tell you about children throwing rocks at Israeli tanks seconds before becoming daisies.” In three swift moves—title, image, image—Hindi sets the scene: a young Palestinian writer in a creative writing workshop, likely a poetry workshop, who has urgent things to say and wants the tools to say them effectively, but who is jarred by the values and priorities of a professor invested in the American academy’s Anglocentric tradition of reading and writing. In Hindi’s poem, this professor will teach her how to use metaphor to praise the beauty of the moon and flowers and how to use metaphor to speak of death. Hindi suggests that what is offered, pedagogically, by someone trained to train others’ gaze in a lyrically cadenced appreciation as a convention of genre and who applies that aestheticizing (and perhaps anesthetizing) gaze to flowers and death as though both are wonders of nature, is screamingly inadequate for a student who comes to language to process existence as/under a constant death threat, and whose very ability to gaze or think or write experiences similar threat. [End Page 27] I’m reminded of a snark I read more than fifteen years ago, whose author I don’t remember, about how the then-mainstream award-winning poets, who tended to be white academics, loved to write about being at their cottage and noticing the quality of the light falling on the(ir) lake. It stayed with me because I recognized the aesthetic of a propertied class and felt no confidence in my ability to do authentic trade in it. Literary journals were full of poems that either bemoaned the bored tensions of middle-class married life or read like humblebrags on the quietude of spending one’s leisure becoming an amateur botanist/entomologist/zoologist. My voice wanted to yell, beatbox, groan, chant, and sing spaces into existence, spaces that welcomed me and the threat I posed to my professors’ sensibilities. My very impulse to write emerged threaded with desire to challenge to the cultural and racial dominance, and the privilege-inflected gazes, of those who spent time at lake cottages and in muse-worthy gardens. The writing of Noor’s student speaker, simply by coming into existence, contests the gazes of those who see her people as, at best, “foreign” and less suitable as an object of poetic attention than wildflowers and, at worst, as a cultural threat to be systematically eradicated. When she says, “They’re so beautiful, the flowers,” we hear layers of longing and anger around the privilege of being able to use one’s precious writing energy to stop and smell roses rather than to advocate for one’s life. “One day, I’ll write about flowers like we own them,” is Hindi’s final declaration, after she writes about her dead father, about “Jessica” texting her “Happy Ramadan,” and about Palestinians not being able to see the moon from jail cells. Hindi identifies the dominant, approved gaze of the workshop with a gaze of ownership. Does she end on this note because the sense of urgency and love that compels her work also includes a wish for her own people to be the ones doing the owning? Or does this concluding image forebode that once Hindi has been put through the paces of a creative writing poetry workshop, she will now write as the colonizer does? Is this a fear, or a wish, this anticipation of her voice having been effectively disciplined? My own pedagogy, as teacher of both English Literature and Creative Writing, has always been informed by my own experiences of feeling Eurocentric, colonial values toward “resources,” property, bodies, and power passed onto and directed at me as I was being taught canon, craft, and argument. The question of how English departments see themselves in relation to the justice work of decolonizing, starts, I think, with feeling the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207