Customised abutment for achieving the predictable emergence profile for immediate implant in molar site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The alveolar bone undergoes a remodelling process after tooth extraction, which leads to horizontal and vertical bone loss. These resorption processes complicate dental rehabilitation, particularly in connection with implants. Clinical studies have suggested that retaining roots of hopeless teeth may avoid tissue alterations after tooth extraction. The aim is to seal the surgical site following the outline of extraction socket and to develop an ideal prosthetic emergence profile, modelled on the anatomy of the existing tooth. In present case report a non restorable mandibular molar was treated with socket sealing protocol followed by immediate implant placement. Using sequential osteotomy drills implant site was prepared and roots were dissected in buccolingual direction along the long axis. Roots were extracted using elevators and implant of desired size was placed. A Customized sealing socket abutment (SSA) was prepared to support the coronal emergence profile of the tooth. This technique is a minimally invasive that can preserve the hard and the soft tissue contour of the ridge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".