MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shutter/Shudder to Think: Cinema after Cage

2022· article· en· W4297200047 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Slopek

Bibliographic record

VenueAVANCA | CINEMA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJohn CageMovie theaterArtMainstreamVisual artsArt historyPaintingSubjectivityUnconscious mindPercussionShutterAestheticsLiteraturePerformance artPsychoanalysisPhilosophyPsychologyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

states, is a powerful, shadowy neo-noir pastiche that tracks the tightly wound central character, Teddy, an ex-soldier haunted by memories of his wife's accidental death-by-fire and his presence at the liberation of the Nazi concentration camp at Dachau, as he spirals into a world of madness and paranoia, in a film that is in the end itself framed by a semidark Calligarian misdirection -with a secret that indulges viewers long after that secret has been divulged.After reading the script, Robertson, who had previously collaborated with Scorsese as composer, producer, or consultant on a number of his films, including Raging Bull, The King of Comedy, Casino, and The Departed, was convinced that in order to add emotional texture to the film that didn't simply function as a cue to the action or to reinforce some plot point, but instead imparted a menacing and uncanny mood of suspense, tension and ambient unease, a soundtrack of mostly modern avant-garde classical pieces was necessary.Robertson, who for decades has been a fan of music residing outside the realm of popular culture -"music that…was never trendy, was never what's happening" (https://www.theringer.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAVANCA | CINEMASame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207