The impacts of vorinostat on NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial biogenesis gene expression in the heart of mice model of depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The comorbidity of depression and high risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been reported as major health problems. Our previous study confirmed that fluoxetine (FLX) therapy had a significant influence on brain function but not on the heart in depression. In the present study, suberoyanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) was proposed as another therapeutic candidate for treatment of depression comorbid CVD in maternal separation model, following behavioral analyses and gene expression level in the heart. Our data demonstrated that SAHA significantly attenuates the NOX-4 gene expression level in treated mice with SAHA and FLX without significant change in NOX-2 expression level. SAHA decreased the gene expression level of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator (PGC-1α) and nuclear respiratory factors (Nrf2) in heart tissues of maternally separated mice. It supposed that non-effectiveness of FLX on mitochondrial biogenesis and NOX gene expression level in the heart of depressed patient can be related to recurrence of depression. It revealed that SAHA not only reversed the depressive-like behavior similar to our previous data but also recovered the heart mitochondrial function via effect on NOX-2, NOX-4, and mitochondrial biogenesis genes' (PGC-1 α, Nrf-2, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- α (PPAR- α)) expression levels. We suggest performing more studies to confirm SAHA as a therapeutic candidate in depression comorbid CVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".