MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297215855 · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.023

Corrigendum to “Structural and functional correlates of deep brain stimulation-induced apathy in Parkinson's disease”

2022· erratum· en· W4297215855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lennard I. Boon, Wouter V. Potters, Thomas J.C. Zoon, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Naomi Prent, Rob M.A. de Bie, Maarten Bot, P. Richard Schuurman, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Gert J. Geurtsen, Arjan Hillebrand, Cornelis J. Stam, Anne‐Fleur van Rootselaar, Henk W. Berendse

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain stimulation · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApathyStimulationDeep brain stimulationSubthalamic nucleusPsychologyBrain stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulationNeuroscienceMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationParkinson's diseaseAudiologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors apologize for an error in the published version of the above article. In the visualization of deep brain stimulation contact point positions (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure E), left and right were swapped. As a result, we wrongly stated that left-sided stimulation positions were correlated with the occurrence of post-operative apathy. Instead, this statement should have been made regarding right-sided stimulation positions. Since we did not elaborate on the lateralization of our results, the error did not affect the main conclusions of the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3730.182

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain stimulationSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207