The Kuramoto–Lohe model and collective absorption of a photon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Light absorption by molecular exciton states in disordered networks is studied. The main purpose of this paper is to look at how phases of the intermediate ground–excited state superposition interfere during the absorption process. How does this phase average enable, or suppress, absorption to a delocalized state? To address this question, a theory for phase oscillators is used to predict the purity of the collective excited state of the network. The results of the study suggest that collective absorption by molecular exciton states requires a sufficiently large electronic coupling between molecules in the network compared to the random distribution of transition energies at the sites, even when the molecular network is completely isolated from the environment degrees of freedom. The ‘dividing line’ between absorption to a mixture of, essentially, localized excited states and coherent excitation of a pure delocalized exciton state is suggested to be predicted by the threshold of phase synchronization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it