The Effect of Micro-Flipped Classroom in the Context of Distance Learning on TESOL Master Students' Achievement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Undoubtedly, Online Learning will continue to play an increasingly significant role in the years to come. So, the question is no longer whether instructors should use online learning environment or not, but rather how best to incorporate various educational strategies and practices into online classroom settings. As such, the purpose of the study is to determine the effect of using micro-flipped classroom in the context of distance learning on TESOL master students' achievement. The study was conducted on an experimental basis. It was applied to experiment (n=14) and control (n=15) groups. Data were collected through a pre-post test, and were then analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnova and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Effect size technique was used to measure the influence of micro-flipped classroom on the experimental group. At the end of the study, it has been found out that the micro-flipped classroom in the context of distance learning has positive effects on TESOL Master Students' Achievement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it