Carnet de voyage de la mise en œuvre de l’approche DPA-PC en Gironde
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le pouvoir d’agir, le développement du pouvoir d’agir, la participation sont autant de termes qui font aujourd’hui partie d’un vocabulaire commun. Ces récurrences contribuent à la diffusion de ces concepts mais amènent aussi des confusions voire des instrumentalisations faute de bien comprendre ce qu’ils recouvrent pour les personnes accompagnées. Cet article propose d’illustrer ces concepts par le partage d’une aventure, celle de la mise en œuvre de l’approche centrée sur le Développement du Pouvoir d’Agir des Personnes et des Collectivités (DPA-PC) dans le Département de la Gironde. Si le DPA-PC peut être considéré comme un levier au service des concepts précités, il importe d’en observer les questionnements et les effets. C’est ce que proposent les témoignages recueillis dans cet article qui, par leurs regards croisés, suscitent la réflexivité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it