Extended genomic analyses of the broad-host-range phages vB_KmiM-2Di and vB_KmiM-4Dii reveal slopekviruses have highly conserved genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High levels of antimicrobial resistance among members of the Klebsiella oxytoca complex (KoC) have led to renewed interest in the use of bacteriophage (phage) therapy to tackle infections caused by these bacteria. In this study we characterized two lytic phages, vB_KmiM-2Di and vB_KmiM-4Dii, that were isolated from sewage water against two GES-5-positive Klebsiella michiganensis strains (PS_Koxy2 and PS_Koxy4, respectively). ViPTree analysis showed both phages belonged to the genus Slopekvirus. rpoB gene-based sequence analysis of 108 presumptive K. oxytoca isolates ( n =59 clinical, n =49 veterinary) found K. michiganensis to be more prevalent (46 % clinical and 43 % veterinary, respectively) than K. oxytoca (40 % clinical and 6 % veterinary, respectively). Host range analysis against these 108 isolates found both vB_KmiM-2Di and vB_KmiM-4Dii showed broad lytic activity against KoC species. Several hypothetical homing endonuclease genes were encoded within the genomes of both phages, which may contribute to their broad host range. Differences in the tail fibre protein may explain the non-identical host range of the two phages. Pangenome analysis of 24 slopekviruses found that genomes within this genus are highly conserved, with more than 50 % of all predicted coding sequences representing core genes at ≥95 % identity and ≥70 % coverage. Given their broad host ranges, our results suggest vB_KmiM-2Di and vB_KmiM-4Dii represent attractive potential therapeutics. In addition, current recommendations for phage-based pangenome analyses may require revision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".