MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297243491 · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000001760

Strain on the ICU resources and patient outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic

2022· article· en· W4297243491 on OpenAlexaff
Karl Stattin, Robert Frithiof, Michael Hultström, Miklós Lipcsey, Rafael Kawati

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMechanical ventilationRenal replacement therapyEmergency medicineIntensive care unitIntensive careOxygen therapyCohortPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Intensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an unprecedented strain on the ICU resources. It is not known how the ICU resources employed in treating COVID-19 patients are related to inpatient characteristics, use of organ support or mortality. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how the use of ICU resources relate to use of organ support and mortality in COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: A national register-based cohort study. SETTING: All Swedish ICUs from March 2020 to November 2021. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to Swedish ICUs with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 reported to the national Swedish Intensive Care Register (SIR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Organ support (mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, high-flow oxygen therapy, prone positioning, surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy, central venous catheterisation, continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent haemodialysis), discharge at night, re-admission, transfer and ICU and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Seven thousand nine hundred and sixty-nine patients had a median age of 63 years, and 70% were men. Median daily census was 167% of habitual census, daily new admissions were 20% of habitual census and the median occupancy was 82%. Census and new admissions were associated with mechanical ventilation, OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.28 to 1.48) and OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.84), respectively, but negatively associated with noninvasive ventilation, OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.89) and OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.30 to 52) and high-flow oxygen therapy, OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.77) and OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.97). Occupancy above 90% of available beds was not associated with mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation, but with high-flow oxygen therapy, OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.53). All measures of pressure on resources were associated with transfer to other hospitals, but none were associated with discharge at night, ICU mortality or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure on ICU resources was associated with more invasive respiratory support, indicating that during these times, ICU resources were reserved for sicker patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of AnaesthesiologySame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207