MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297268591 · doi:10.3390/app12199726

An Efficient FPGA Implementation of MUSIC Processor Using Cyclic Jacobi Method: LiDAR Applications

2022· article· en· W4297268591 on OpenAlexaff
Ridha Ghayoula, Issam El Gmati, Amor Smida, Jaouhar Fattahi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSingular value decompositionField-programmable gate arrayEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSingular valueLidarPosition (finance)AlgorithmJacobian matrix and determinantJacobi methodJacobi eigenvalue algorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsComputer hardwareApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LiDAR is a technology that uses lasers to measure the position of elements. Measuring the laser travel time and calculating the distance between the LiDAR and the surface requires the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the convergence matrix. SVD algorithms have been proposed to solve an eigenvalue problem, which is computationally expensive. As embedded systems are resource-constrained hardware, optimized algorithms are needed. This is the subject of our paper. The first part of this paper presents the methodology and the internal architectures of the MUSIC processor using the Cyclic Jacobi method. The second part presents the results obtained at each step of the FPGA processing, such as the complex covariance matrix, the unitary and inverse transformation, and the value and vector decomposition. We compare them to their equivalents in the literature. Finally, simulations are performed to select the way that guarantees the best performance in terms of speed, accuracy and power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207