Les Métamorphoses d’Apulée : entre mondes grec et romain, un document pour l’historien ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En raison des realia qui en apparence émaillent le texte, la tentation est grande pour l’historien d’admettre les Métamorphoses d’Apulée au nombre des sources de l’histoire de l’Empire romain au iie siècle apr. J.‑C. Cependant, ce « roman » en langue latine emprunte sa trame à un ouvrage grec antérieur et Apulée présente lui‑même son œuvre comme une « fable milésienne ». La difficulté à distinguer dans le récit les apports d’Apulée par rapport à l’original, comme la volonté affichée de divertir le lecteur, invitent à considérer avec prudence les éventuelles informations historiques contenues dans l’œuvre. Toutefois, le texte apuléien peut être confirmé au cas par cas par des sources primaires, comme l’illustrent trois exemples, les scènes d’auberge au livre I et deux cas consécutifs d’abus de pouvoir au livre IX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".