“<scp>DNA</scp> Evidence and the Islamic Law of Paternity in Light of <i>Maqāṣid <scp>al‐Sharīʿa</scp></i>”
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The protection of progeny ( nasl ) is one of the five universal ends ( al‐maqāṣid al‐kulliyya al‐khams ) of Islamic law. Despite this principle, classical Islamic law ( fiqh ), with very limited exceptions, barred affiliating a child conceived through illicit intercourse to the child’s biological father, even if his identity was known. Was this based on a pragmatic recognition of the impossibility of identifying the “true” biological father of any child or a commitment to a deeper principle? If the former, the reliability of DNA testing would require a change in the rule, but if the latter, DNA’s reliability would be irrelevant. Using primarily examples drawn from the Mālikī school of law, this paper argues, based on a purposive reading of those rules, that biological paternity, while important to Islamic law’s juridical conception of paternity, was not always the most important legal value at stake. Rather, preserving a child’s presumptive affiliation to the mother’s legitimate sexual partner was also a crucial legal value that could carry greater weight than biological paternity when the two conflicted. The tendency to entrench the biological mother’s legitimate sexual partner as the child’s lawful father in all but the most obvious cases of adulterous conception suggests that for pre‐modern Islamic law, the best interests of the child weighed heavily in the law of paternity. In modern circumstances, therefore, DNA evidence of biological paternity, while it should be admissible to establish paternity of illegitimate children born to unmarried women, should not be admissible in cases involving children born to married women. Muslim states could also use DNA evidence of paternity to establish the monetary responsibility of adulterous fathers for their illegitimate children while denying them the benefits of legal paternity. Muslim states, in recognition of the importance of the well‐being of the child, might also reconsider their laws on adoption, by introducing distinctions between adoptive parents and children, on the one hand, and parents and children related by nasab, on the other hand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it