MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297323840 · doi:10.1089/acu.2022.0030

The Anatomical Specificity Between Acupoints and the Facial Nerve: A Cadaveric Study

2022· article· en· W4297323840 on OpenAlexaff
Poney Chiang, Mariana Ravazolli Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Acupuncture · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsIntegrity Testing Laboratory (Canada)York University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFacial nerveAnatomyAcupunctureCadaveric spasmCadaverDissection (medical)Pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This research was conducted to increase precision of point location and standardize acupoint targets in relation to the facial nerve (CN VII). Materials and Methods: A literature review, cadaver dissection, and electrostimulation of the CN VII were performed, focusing on the anatomical locations of the acupoints along the facial-nerve trajectory. The results were contrasted against established acupoint locations described in the 4th edition of Results: at the frontotemporal branch; Gallbladder (GB)-3 at the zygomatic branch; Small Intestine (SI)-18 at the buccal branch; Stomach (ST)-5 at the marginal mandibular branch; SI-17 at the cervical branch; TE-18 at the posterior auricular branch; TE-19 at the posterior auricular nerve; TE-20 at the superior auricular nerve; and TE-22 at the anterior auricular nerve. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the specificity with which acupuncture points are located in relation to the facial nerve. Standardization of facial acupuncture points to distinct branches of the facial nerve will facilitate reproducible research designs and interpractitioner reproducibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical AcupunctureSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207