MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297327671 · doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.017

Incessant ventricular tachycardia with simultaneous recording of separate exits with common isthmus wavefront propagation

2022· article· en· W4297327671 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Tetreault-Langlois, Antonio Frontera, Alexios Hadjis

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm O2 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavefrontCardiologyVentricular tachycardiaMedicineInternal medicineGeologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms of bimorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been studied since the 1980s. Miller et al1 described possible mechanisms that could explain variable QRS morphologies on surface electrocardiogram (ECG): different expressions of the same VT circuit due to preferential exit points along a shared isthmus; distinct circuits closely placed; and widely unconnected arrhythmogenic sites. The first 2 mechanisms seem to account for most cases of bimorphic VT seen in clinical practice. Bogun et al2 reported that a shared isthmus with different exit points may account for up to 40% of bimorphic VTs in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeart Rhythm O2Same topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207