MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk Factors for Breast Malignancy among Women Presenting with Breast Masses in a Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria

2022· article· en· W4297329539 on OpenAlexaff
Obianuju Mirian Akujuobi, Uzoramaka Angela Ayonote, Adaobi Nneamaka Ogbonna

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsYorkville University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOverweightObstetricsFamily historyMalignancyBreast painGynecologyBreast biopsyBiopsyBody mass indexMammographyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Breast cancer is the commonest female malignancy globally with increasing prevalence in Nigeria. This study aimed at identifying factors associated with malignant breast masses among women with breast masses receiving care at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH).
 Materials: This cross-sectional, descriptive study investigated 100 women with breast masses by history-taking, clinical breast examination and biopsy for histopathology assessment. Sociodemographic characteristics, family, social, gynecologic, and obstetric history were obtained, and features of breast mass on examination were documented and histology specimens were taken for assessment. The proportion of women with malignant breast masses by biopsy was calculated. Using binary logistic regression analysis, factors associated with malignant breast masses were identified. Significance level was set at p < 0.05.
 Results: The mean age of participants was 39.4±13.4 years. Most were married (63.0%), overweight (53.0%) and had tertiary level of education (58.0%). The right breast was affected in 56% of women, while most breast masses were oval (49.0%). History of breast pain, exclusive breast feeding and nipple retraction was reported in 76.0%, 35.0% and 17.0% respectively. Malignant breast masses were identified in 46.0% of women and associated factors included increasing age (OR=10.95 – 442.00; p<0.05), married women (OR=6.96; p: 0.001), obesity (OR= 16.20; p: 0.003). Clinical symptoms associated with malignant breast mass included history of previous breast mass (OR = 3.93; p: 0.028), breast pain (OR = 3.07; p: 0.023), nipple retraction (OR=7.44;0.003) and nipple discharge (OR = 10.24; 0.003).
 Conclusion: The study found that a high percentage of breast masses assessed by biopsy were malignant among the studied populace. Factors significantly associated with increased risk of malignant breast mass included increasing age, obesity, and marital status. We recommend lifestyle modification as well as adoption of primordial and primary prevention measures in tackling problems related with breast cancer among Nigerian women. This should also include the improvement of access to such services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & HealthSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207