MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297347016 · doi:10.1101/2022.09.27.22280421

Classification of <i>GBA1</i> variants in Parkinson’s disease; the <i>GBA1</i> -PD browser

2022· preprint· en· W4297347016 on OpenAlexafffund
Sitki Cem Parlar, Francis P. Grenn, Jonggeol Jeffrey Kim, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute on AgingConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsOdds ratioParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMedicineBioinformaticsInternal medicineOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background GBA1 variants are among the most common genetic risk factors for Parkinson’s Disease (PD). GBA1 variants can be classified into three categories based on their role in Gaucher’s Disease (GD) or PD: severe, mild, and risk variant (for PD). Objectives This paper aims to generate and share a comprehensive database for GBA1 variants reported in PD to support future research and clinical trials. Methods We performed a literature search for all GBA1 variants that have been reported in PD. The data has been standardized and complimented with variant classification, Odds Ratio (OR) if available and other data. Results We found 371 GBA1 variants reported in PD: 22 mild, 84 severe, 3 risk variants, and 262 of unknown status. We created a browser, containing up-to-date information on these variants ( https://pdgenetics.shinyapps.io/GBA1Browser/ ). Conclusions The classification and browser presented in this work should inform and support basic, translational, and clinical research on GBA1 -PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207