Inertia Dominant and Transient Flow in Fractures - Beyond the Cubic Law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: There are many applications which require a fracture flow model that accounts for variations in aperture beyond surface roughness. Large-scale models and simulations of fluid flow through fractures are almost exclusively based on the cubic law (Poiseuille flow) for steady-state flow through rigid parallel plates. When the fracture aperture is time and/or spatially varying, flow is transient, and/or flow rates are modest (Re≥1), cubic law predictions can deviate substantially from true fluid behaviour. In this paper, we present a new Reduced Dimension Fracture Flow (RDFF) model which more accurately predicts transient flow for incompressible fluids with modest Reynolds numbers through fractures with time and/or spatially varying aperture. The RDFF model is derived from the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations and yields a two-field model (fluid flux and pressure) governed by the conservation of mass and momentum. The RDFF model is shown to conserve energy in spatially varying fractures where the cubic law does not. We demonstrate that the RDFF model captures complex transient and inertial behaviours not previously captured for flows with modest Reynolds numbers (1≤Re≤100) and demonstrates up to 400% improvements in error over the cubic law in steady-state flow conditions through fractures with sinusoidally varying aperture. 1 INTRODUCTION Large-scale simulations of flow through fractures rely almost exclusively on the Poiseuille flow model, also known as "the cubic law". The cubic law is the analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equations for steady flow of an incompressible fluid through parallel plates. It provides a constitutive equation linking the pressure gradient to the fluid flux according to the relationship (Equation) in which p is the pressure, μ is the kinematic fluid viscosity, w is the fracture aperture, and q is the fluid flux. In hydro-mechanical models with deformable fractures, such as hydraulic fracturing or enhanced geothermal energy, the cubic law is often combined with the conservation of mass derived from a fracture-scale control volume: (Equation) in which q is the flux from the cubic law. Despite the assumption that the cubic law applies for rigid parallel plate geometries, the conservation of mass allows both time and spatially varying apertures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".