MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297359321 · doi:10.4000/viatourism.8282

Estrategia de control de la movilidad turística: análisis de los procesos biopolíticos de territorialización de la industria del turismo de cruceros dentro de un destino caribeño

2022· article· es· W4297359321 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueVia Tourism Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCruise Tourism Development and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El despliegue del turismo de cruceros en un destino conduce, a través de un proceso de reterritorialización del espacio vital, a la producción de un espacio de turismo de cruceros. Para responder a las prerrogativas de su modelo de negocio, la industria del turismo de cruceros está desarrollando este nuevo espacio movilizando procesos biopolíticos que se derivan de estrategias de control territorial sobre la movilidad de los turistas y de los agentes turísticos locales. Con base en una metodología cuantitativa y en un modelo de espacio turístico teniendo en cuenta 16 zonas producto de la territorialización del espacio de vida de las comunidades receptoras, el estudio ofrece una comprensión detallada de las estrategias discursivas y materiales puestas en marcha por la industria del turismo de cruceros para asegurar el control del espacio ocupado. Se discute la gestión territorial por parte de las comunidades locales a través del ejercicio del biopoder democrático “de abajo hacia arriba”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVia Tourism ReviewSame topicCruise Tourism Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207