MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297359455 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2022.09.003

Management of vitiligo with topical janus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy: An evidence-based review

2022· article· en· W4297359455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAD International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsProbity Medical ResearchHealth Sciences CentreWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitiligoMedicineDermatologyJanus kinase inhibitorPopulationJanus kinaseCalcineurinInternal medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Vitiligo is an acquired depigmenting skin disorder due to the absence of functional melanocytes affecting up to 1% of the general population.1Ezzedine K. Eleftheriadou V. Whitton M. van Geel N. Vitiligo.Lancet. 2015; 386: 74-84https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60763-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (449) Google Scholar Initial treatment typically involves topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and phototherapy; however, topical Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are being explored as a potential treatment option. This systematic review examines the efficacy and safety of topical JAKi therapies in vitiligo. Following the PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE and Embase Ovid searches were conducted, using variations and synonyms of keywords "Vitiligo" and "JAK inhibitor" (Supplementary File 1, available via Mendeley at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/ngwr9gns95). After independent screening of 240 articles by 2 reviewers with no exclusion based on study type, 12 studies involving 213 patients were included. (Fig 1; Supplementary File 2, available via Mendeley at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/ngwr9gns95). The mean age was 48.5 years (range: 4-73 years), with 108 males (50.7%) and 105 females (49.3%). Ruxolitinib (84%) was the most common therapy followed by tofacitinib (15%) and delgocitinib (1%). Treatment duration was described in 212 instances (mean: 44.9 weeks; range: 4.6-52 weeks). Facial Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (F-VASI) scores were measured in 159 cases, with 64.8%, 53.5%, and 29.6% of cases achieving ≥50% (VASI50), ≥75% (VASI75), and ≥90% (VASI90) reductions from baseline VASI, respectively. Total VASI (T-VASI) scores were measured in 83.6% of cases, with 33.5%, 11.2%, and 6.7% of cases achieving ≥50% (T-VASI50), ≥75% (T-VASI75), and ≥90% (T-VASI90) reductions from baseline T-VASI, respectively. Concurrent treatment with non-JAKi therapies was noted in 39 cases, with phototherapy and topical corticosteroids accounting for 23 and 6 of the concurrent treatments, respectively (Supplementary File 2). Adverse events were reported in 113 cases using JAKi, with pruritis (12.2%), upper respiratory tract infections (10.8%), and acne (8.5%) being the most documented adverse events. The appeal of topical JAKi is the potential to provide adequate response in patients no longer responding to older topical agents and to reduce adverse events of interest (eg, infections) that may present through oral JAKi administration.2Solimani F. Meier K. Ghoreschi K. Emerging topical and systemic JAK inhibitors in dermatology.Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 2847https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02847Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar Ruxolitinib was the most studied topical JAKi treatment for vitiligo, with 49.7% and 29.6% of cases achieving F-VASI50/T-VASI50, respectively. In a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of topical ruxolitinib for vitiligo, 45% and 30% of cases achieving F-VASI50/T-VASI50, respectively.3Rosmarin D. Pandya A.G. Lebwohl M. et al.Ruxolitinib cream for treatment of vitiligo: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2020; 396: 110-120https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30609-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar Ruxolitinub's mechanism of action involves JAK mediated inhibition of IFNγ (interferon gamma) signaling. The IFNγ induced expression of C-X-C motif chemokine 10 in keratinocytes is an important mediator of depigmentation in vitiligo.3Rosmarin D. Pandya A.G. Lebwohl M. et al.Ruxolitinib cream for treatment of vitiligo: a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.Lancet. 2020; 396: 110-120https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30609-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar Topical tofacitinib resulted in 46.9% and 53.1% of cases achieving F-VASI50/T-VASI50, respectively. Tofacitinib works in a similar fashion to ruxolitinib, with any differences in efficacy owing to targeting of JAK1/3 as opposed to JAK1/2 with ruxolitinib.4Papp K.A. Menter A. Strober B. et al.Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of psoriasis: a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging study.Br J Dermatol. 2012; 167: 668-677https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11168.xCrossref PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholar Ruxolitinib is currently the only topical JAKi to receive FDA approval for vitiligo treatment.5Sheikh A. Rafique W. Owais R. Malik F. Ali E. FDA approves ruxolitinib (Opzelura) for vitiligo therapy: a breakthrough in the field of dermatology.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 81: 104499https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104499Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Study limitations included lack of follow-up data and potential selection bias for cases with improved outcomes. Given the lack of standardized outcome measures and data heterogeneity, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Despite this, we highlight evidence for the effectiveness and safety of topical JAKi therapies, specifically ruxolitinib and tofacitinib, for treating vitiligo. Further long-term studies are warranted to establish practical clinical applications of topical JAK inhibitors. Dr Yeung has been an advisor, consultant, speaker, and/or investigator for AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Coherus, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Forward, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Medimmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB, Valeant, and Xenon. Abduelmula, Mufti, Chong, Sood, and Sachdeva have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it