Validation of time temperature superposition principle for high modulus asphalt concrete in the linear viscoelastic and fatigue domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Validation of time–temperature superposition principle (TTSP) in the fatigue domain for a high modulus asphalt concrete (HMAC) is presented in this paper. All tests were performed in tension‐compression under strain control mode. First, TTSP was validated in the linear viscoelastic domain. Then, fatigue tests were performed under three loading conditions, 9.2°C and 5 Hz, 11.0°C and 10 Hz and 12.9°C and 20 Hz, which are equivalent regarding TTSP. Two fatigue protocols were adopted: continuous fatigue test (FT) and fatigue test with rest period (FTRP). For FT, three samples were tested at 180μm/m for each loading condition whereas for FTRP, one sample was tested at 100 μm/m. The data were analysed by comparing the dynamic modulus evolution as a function of time or the fatigue life duration. The results showed that HMAC with fatigue damage remains thermorheologically simple (i.e., respects the TTSP) in the studied temperatures range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".