MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297399468 · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2022.102778

A review of zeta potential measurements using electroacoustics

2022· review· en· W4297399468 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Colloid and Interface Science · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrokinetic phenomenaZeta potentialNanotechnologyColloidAqueous solutionPolymerMaterials scienceChemistryNanoparticlePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electroacoustic technique has been successfully used to determine the zeta potential of concentrated aqueous suspensions for over thirty years. This article reviews its use in mineral processing, ceramics, zeolites, and other industrial minerals and in particular identifies the isoelectric points of these materials, as this parameter is crucial for determining colloidal stability and hence subsequent processing. Some benefits of this technique over the traditional electrokinetic measurement techniques are also highlighted. Finally, the application of the technique to polymer lattices is summarized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it