MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proton Distribution Radii of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mi>–</mml:mi><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>: Signatures of New Shell Closures and Neutron Skin

2022· article· lv· W4297475200 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Kaur, R. Kanungo, W. Horiuchi, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, B. S. Hu, T. Miyagi, Toshio Suzuki, F. Ameil, J. Atkinson, Y. Ayyad, S. Bagchi, D. Cortina‐Gil, I. Dillmann, A. Estradé, A. Evdokimov, F. Farinon, H. Geißel, G. Guastalla, R. Janik, R. Knöbel, J. Kurcewicz, Yu. A. Litvinov, M. Marta, I. Mukha, C. Nociforo, H. J. Ong, Takaharu Otsuka, S. Piétri, A. Prochazka, C. Scheidenberger, B. Sitár, P. Strmeň, M. Takechi, Junki Tanaka, I. Tanihata, S. Terashima, J. E. Ramirez Vargas, H. Weick, J. S. Winfield

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBeihang UniversityNational Ten Thousand Talent ProgramJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceCompute CanadaWestern Canada Research GridBattelleDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsProtonNeutronCharge densityCharge (physics)Ab initioAtomic physicsNuclear physicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The root mean square radii of the proton density distribution in ^{16-24}O derived from measurements of charge changing cross sections with a carbon target at ∼900A MeV together with the matter radii portray thick neutron skin for ^{22-24}O despite ^{22,24}O being doubly magic. Imprints of the shell closures at N=14 and 16 are reflected in local minima of their proton radii that provide evidence for the tensor interaction causing them. The radii agree with ab initio calculations employing the chiral NNLO_{sat} interaction, though skin thickness predictions are challenged. Shell model predictions agree well with the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207