MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297475645 · doi:10.1080/09506608.2022.2126257

Modelling of the diffusional austenite-ferrite transformation

2022· article· en· W4297475645 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias Militzer, Christopher Hutchinson, Hatem S. Zurob, Gorō Miyamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Materials Reviews · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAusteniteFerrite (magnet)Materials scienceBeta ferriteMetallurgyMicrostructureComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The austenite-ferrite transformation is the key metallurgical tool to tailor properties of low alloyed steels and remains an active area of research. Models have yet to be developed with truly predictive capabilities for phase transformations in multi-component commercial steels. This review provides a critical analysis of the various austenite-to-ferrite diffusional transformation model approaches that have been significantly broadened over the past decade by modelling at different length scales, i.e. classical macro-scale models have been augmented with simulations at the meso-scale and atomistic scale. Both semi-empirical and fundamental models are reviewed with an emphasis on polygonal ferrite formation in low and medium carbon steels. Formation of ferrite with more complex morphologies (i.e. irregular/bainitic/Widmanstätten ferrite) is also discussed. In particular, approaches to describe the interaction of alloying elements with the austenite-ferrite interface are critically analysed. The paper concludes with an outlook on the proposed austenite-ferrite transformation modelling work for the next decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Materials ReviewsSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207