MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297491470 · doi:10.30683/1927-7229.2022.11.05

Radiodynamic Therapy with Chlorine-Based Photosensitizer on Pliss Lymphosarcoma Solid Tumor: In Vivo Experiment

2022· article· en· W4297491470 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. A. Tzerkovsky, A.N. Mazurenko, D.I. Kozlovsky, F.F. Borychevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Academy of Sciences of Belarus
KeywordsMedicinePhotosensitizerNuclear medicineIn vivoRadiation therapyPhotodynamic therapyUrologyInternal medicineChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to investigate the antitumor efficacy of radiodynamic therapy (RDT) with a chlorin-based photosensitizer (PS) in an in vivo experiment. Material and Methods: The study was performed in 35 white outbred rats weighing 180±30 g. Subcutaneously transplanted Pliss lymphosarcoma (PLS) was used as tumor model. Chlorin-based PS «Photolon» (RUE «Belmedpreparaty», Republic Belarus) was injected intravenously at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg. The radiation therapy sessions (RT) were carried out once 2.5–3 hours after the administration of the PS by the contact method on the device «microSelectron-HDR V3 Digital» (Elekta, Sweden) using γ-radiation (192Ir) in single focal doses (SFD) 2, 4 and 6 Gy. All laboratory animals were subdivided into 7 groups of 5 animals each: intact control, RT 2 Gy, RT 4 Gy, RT 6 Gy, PS + RT 2 Gy, PS + RT 4 Gy and PS + RT 6 Gy. The antitumor effectiveness of exposure was evaluated according to the indicators characterizing the dynamics of volume changes: Vav. (cm3), the coefficient of absolute tumor growth (K, units) and the coefficient of tumor growth inhibition (TGI, %). The frequency of complete regressions (СR) was estimated 60 days after the performed exposures. In each group, the share of animals (%) with no visual and palpatory signs of tumor growth was evaluated. The differences were considered statistically significant at the significance level of p<0.05. Results: On the 16th day from the beginning of the experiment Vav. in groups were 39.07±4.19; 23.06±3.25 (р=0.012); 35.04±2.35 (р=0.419); 25.83±3.06 (р=0.027); 28.36±3.45 (0.074); 25.47±1.88 (р=0.013) and 16.56±3.64 cm3 (р=0,002), respectively. The K coefficients in the experimental groups were 1219.94; 657.86; 1296.78; 716.50; 833.12; 669.26 and 590.43 units, respectively. The TGI coefficients in the experimental groups were 40.98%; 10.31%; 33.89%; 27.41%; 34.81% and 57.61%, respectively. The frequency of complete tumor regressions 60 days after the start of the experiment was 0%, 20%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: RDT is a recent extension of conventional photodynamic therapy, in which visible/near infrared light irradiation is replaced by a well-tolerated dose of X-rays. Systemic administration of chlorin-based PS before the RT session increases the antitumor efficacy of RT in animals with PLS transplantable tumors. The data obtained indicate that further studies of the radiosensitizing properties of PS are promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207