Competency Experience-Based Training (CEBT) Model with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to Enhance Transformation Digital Supervisor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research subject Competency Experience-Based Training (CEBT) Model with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to Enhance Transformation Digital Supervisor. This research aims to evaluate the digital supervisor competency trained with the Competency Experience-Based Training (CEBT) Model with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP). The researcher has divided the research process into 3 steps as follows: Step 1: To develop the Competency Experience-Based Training (CEBT) Model with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to enhance transformation digital supervisor. Step 2: To develop the Competency Experience-Based Training course with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to enhance transformation digital supervisor. Step 3: Evaluate the digital supervisor competency trained with the Competency Experience-Based Training (CEBT) Model with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP). The results of the research were as follows: 1) the Competency Experience-Based Training course with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to enhance transformation digital supervisor, it consists of 3 main processes and 10 sub-steps. Ubiquitous community of practice consists of 2 parts. 1) Community of practice, and Ubiquitous technology 2) Competency Experience-Based Training course with Ubiquitous Community of Practice (U-CoP) to enhance transformation digital supervisor consisting of 6 components. The results of the evaluation of digital supervisor competency in training participants with a model developed using pre-training and post-training surveys showed that trainees scored higher than their pre-training digital supervisor competency at a statistically significant .01 level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it