MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4297502293 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2200004

Geochemical and Cathodoluminescence Properties as Discriminators to Characterize K-Feldspar in Different Genetic Settings

2022· article· en· W4297502293 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shisheng Li, Lin Li, Sheng‐Rong Li, M. Santosh, Yingxin Song

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodoluminescenceFeldsparGeologyBiotiteLuminescenceHydrothermal circulationMineralogyCretaceousGeochemistryMaterials scienceQuartzPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Potassic alteration is a common feature in hydrothermal ore systems, and both its occurrence and degree can be important features applicable to ore deposit exploration. Here we report results from optical cathodoluminescence (CL) and chemical composition investigations on K-feldspar of different origins in and around the Early Cretaceous lode gold deposits in the Xiaoqinling area, located along the southern margin of the North China Craton. We focus on K-feldspars from an Early Cretaceous biotite monzogranite (G-Kfs), a Paleoproterozoic migmatite (M-Kfs), and a hydrothermal alteration zone of Early Cretaceous gold deposits (H-Kfs). The grain size of G-Kfs ranges from 1 to 4 mm, usually exhibits tartan twinning, and occasionally shows evidence of exsolution. Part of the M-Kfs exhibits tartan twinning, and the grain size shows wide variation (from tens of microns to several centimeters), while the H-Kfs shows no twinning, and the grain size is generally less than 0.5 mm. Optical CL analyses show that the G-Kfs exhibits two emission bands at around 466–472 and 708–713 nm which occur in multiple, alternating dark red and blue zones. The M-Kfs exhibits blue, red, and/or violet-red luminescence resulting from two emission bands at 446–465 and 694–701 nm. The H-Kfs displays a distinct greenish-yellow luminescence resulting from an emission band at 545–550 nm. Electron probe microanalyses show that among the three K-feldspar types, the G-Kfs contains higher Na2O (average: 0.71 wt.%) and Al2O3 (average: 18.79 wt.%) and lower K2O (average: 15.62 wt.%), whereas the H-Kfs shows higher K2O (average: 16.31 wt.%) and lower Na2O (average: 0.45 wt.%) and Al2O3 (average: 18.61 wt.%). The K2O, Na2O, and Al2O3 contents of the M-Kfs are intermediate between those of the G-Kfs and H-Kfs. In transitioning from the G-Kfs, M-Kfs, to H-Kfs, it is noted that the concentrations of Sr, Ba, and Pb decrease progressively, whereas W, V, Zn, Mn, Sc, Ge, and Ga gradually increase. Concentrations of La, Ce, and Eu in the H-Kfs are lower than in the G-Kfs and M-Kfs, and the Cr and Cu concentrations in the G-Kfs are the lowest. Scatter diagrams constructed with Sr, Ba, Pb, and Rb concentrations show that the three types of K-feldspars fall into different fields. These, as well as the CL and spectral properties of K-feldspar, can clearly distinguish the K-feldspars of magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal origin in the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Mineralogist→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→