Automatic COVID-19 Diagnosis System Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A public health emergency threat is happening due to novel coronavirus 2019 (nCoV-2019) throughout the world. nCoV-2019 is also named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is the disease caused by this virus. The virus originates in bats and is transmitted to humans by some unidentified intermediate animals. This virus started around December 2019 at Wuhan of China. After that, it turned into a pandemic. Even though there is no efficient vaccination, the entire world fights against the COVID-19. This article presents an overview of the scenario of the world as well as India. Some of the leading countries in the world are also affected by this virus badly. Even India is the 2nd highest population, is taking necessary precautions to protect it. With the Government of India's decisions, along with effective social distancing and hygienic measures, India is in a better position. But, in the future, COVID19 cases in India, still unpredictable. We designed an algorithm based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which helps to classify COVID19+ and COVID19- persons using people's chest X-ray images automatically generated within the shortest time. The proposed method discovered that employing CT scan medical images produced more accurate results than X-ray images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".