Accurate segmentation of neonatal brain MRI with deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important step toward delivering an accurate connectome of the human brain is robust segmentation of 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which is particularly challenging when carried out on perinatal data. In this paper, we present an automated, deep learning-based pipeline for accurate segmentation of tissues from neonatal brain MRI and extend it by introducing an age prediction pathway. A major constraint to using deep learning techniques on developing brain data is the need to collect large numbers of ground truth labels. We therefore also investigate two practical approaches that can help alleviate the problem of label scarcity without loss of segmentation performance. First, we examine the efficiency of different strategies of distributing a limited budget of annotated 2D slices over 3D training images. In the second approach, we compare the segmentation performance of pre-trained models with different strategies of fine-tuning on a small subset of preterm infants. Our results indicate that distributing labels over a larger number of brain scans can improve segmentation performance. We also show that even partial fine-tuning can be superior in performance to a model trained from scratch, highlighting the relevance of transfer learning strategies under conditions of label scarcity. We illustrate our findings on large, publicly available T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans (n = 709, range of ages at scan: 26–45 weeks) obtained retrospectively from the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".