MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297579164 · doi:10.2118/209727-ms

Liquids Level Calculation in Loaded Gas Wells from Surface Data Using Combined Analytical Modeling of Gaseous Static Liquids Gradient: Part 2

2022· article· en· W4297579164 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Nagoo, Larry Harms, William J. Hearn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCountercurrent exchangeMultiphase flowMechanicsPressure gradientLift (data mining)Flow (mathematics)CasingWork (physics)Petroleum engineeringGas liftWet gasComputational fluid dynamicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsMechanical engineeringGeologyEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As the second part of this series, we apply our much improved understanding of gas flow through static recirculating liquid columns and analytical countercurrent multiphase flow modeling to both conventional and unconventional horizontal gas well liquids loading and a deep dive of the process of wellbore liquids flow reversal post-loading. This part of our work focuses on a step change in understanding the aspect of multiphase flow that is most pertinent to artificial lift - countercurrent liquids loading and gas flow through liquid columns. It is shown that traditional concurrent flow principles and flow pattern maps used in prior commonly used flowing bottom hole pressure correlations do not apply and cannot explain the changing dual pressure gradient profiles in loaded gas wells as a result of flow reversal. Therefore, this work lays the foundation for a change in conversation and focus among the artificial lift community towards countercurrent and static liquid column multiphase flow behaviors prevalent in all liquids-producing gas wells. We show and field-validate a new computational ability to perform multiphase countercurrent liquids loading calculations that dynamically loads a gas well tubing/casing and the calculations of total pressure gradient that varies with the increasing gas holdup along the static liquid columns of these wells. Additionally, we analyze the process of countercurrent flow and put forward a redefinition of onset of liquids flow reversal in the proper context of prior studies in this field. Our results are used to simulate the liquid levels in loaded gas wells from only basic surface field data. This represents an advance towards low-cost, low-carbon gas well production optimization and the opportunity of simulation-based real-time downhole diagnostics to determine digital liquid levels and reliably accurate FBHP in loaded gas wells without the high-carbon costs of wellsite visits and equipment runs. In terms of reliable digital twin applications for gas wells producing liquids, our new method can be performed in an autonomous way on a wellhead - a sort of "gas well liquid level digital sensor" - a solution that takes advantage of available SCADA surface data and converts it to automated calculations of downhole pressures, flow rates and well liquid levels in response to dynamic well operating conditions. For the first time in the industry, we present in this work a simultaneous calculation of loaded gas well FBHP and gaseous liquids level from only surface data. In either cases of liquids loaded gas wells or pumping oil wells with gaseous liquid columns above them, the significant pressure gradient (delta-P) that gaseous liquid columns impose on the formation is of great importance in correctly understanding and analyzing well supply capacity and enhancing downhole production rates during production operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207