MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297676536 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015899

Probing the initial conditions of high-mass star formation

2011· article· en· W4297676536 on OpenAlexaff
T. Pillai, Jens Kauffmann, F. Wyrowski, J. Hatchell, A. G. Gibb, M. A. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnJet Propulsion LaboratoryInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular MicrobiologyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationOak Ridge Associated UniversitiesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAstrophysicsPhysicsStar formationAccretion (finance)InfraredFragmentation (computing)High resolutionTurbulenceStarsAstronomyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most work on high-mass star formation has focused on observations of young massive stars in protoclusters. Very little is known about the preceding stage. Here, we present a new high-resolution study of pre-protocluster regions in tracers exclusively probing the coldest and dense gas (NH2D). The two target regions G29.96−0.02 and G35.20−1.74 (W48) are drawn from the SCAMPS project, which searches for pre-protoclusters near known ultracompact Hii regions. We used our data to constrain the chemical, thermal, kinematic, and physical conditions (i.e., densities) in G29.96e and G35.20w. NH3, NH2D, HCO + , and continuum emission were mapped using the VLA, PdBI, and BIMA. In particular, NH2D is a unique tracer of cold, precluster gas at high densities, while NH3 traces both the cold and warm gas of modest-to-high densities. In G29.96e, Spitzer images reveal two massive filaments, one of them in extinction (infrared dark cloud). Dust and line observations reveal fragmentation into multiple massive cores strung along filamentary structures. Most of these are cold (<20 K), dense (>105 cm-3) and highly deuterated ([NH2D/NH3] > 6%). In particular, we observe very low line widths in NH2D (FWHM ≲ 1 km s-1). These are very narrow lines that are unexpected towards a region forming massive stars. Only one core in the center of each filament appears to be forming massive stars (identified by the presence of masers and massive outflows); however, it appears that only a few such stars are currently forming (i.e., just a single Spitzer source per region). These multi-wavelength, high-resolution observations of high-mass pre-protocluster regions show that the target regions are characterized by (i) turbulent Jeans fragmentation of massive clumps into cores (from a Jeans analysis); (ii) cores and clumps that are “over-bound/subvirial”, i.e. turbulence is too weak to support them against collapse, meaning that (iii) some models of monolithic cloud collapse are quantitatively inconsistent with data; (iv) accretion from the core onto a massive star, which can (for observed core sizes and velocities) be sustained by accretion of envelope material onto the core, suggesting that (similar to competitive accretion scenarios) the mass reservoir for star formation is not necessarily limited to the natal core; (v) high deuteration ratios ([NH2D/NH3] > 6%), which make the above discoveries possible; (vi) and the destruction of NH2D toward embedded stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations158
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207