MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297774583 · doi:10.4000/eps.3912

Vieillir en pavillon : mobilités et ancrages des personnes âgées dans les espaces périurbains d’aires métropolitaines (Toulouse, Paris, Marseille)

2010· article· fr· W4297774583 on OpenAlex
Martine Berger, Lionel Rougé, Sandra Thomann, Christiane Thouzellier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace populations sociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaEmbeddednessHumanitiesSociologyGeographyArtAnthropologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article, après la présentation d’une présence importante et d’une relative stabilité des retraités dans les communes périurbaines, s’interroge sur les ressorts du maintien de cette attractivité périurbaine, en s’appuyant sur des enquêtes réalisées dans trois aires métropolitaines, celles de Paris, d’Aix-Marseille et de Toulouse. Les auteurs soulignent les tactiques et les stratégies des retraités pour se maintenir le plus durablement possible dans leur environnement. Les discours des personnes enquêtées reflètent bien l’impression d’ancrage et d’attachement à la maison individuelle, à la propriété, à un entourage social constitué souvent de longue date, qui constitue le cadre tant valorisé des espaces périurbains. Si le travail d’investigation souligne les limites à ce vieillissement en périurbain, il suggère néanmoins l’hypothèse d’une possible maturation de ces espaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it