Répercussions biopsychosociales du Sida et pistes d’intervention et de recherche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le syndrome d'immunodéficience acquise (SIDA) constitue un problème mondial de santé publique d'une ampleur exceptionnelle. Son impact est considérable sur plusieurs plans : individuel, social, économique, démographique et culturel. Les écrits relatifs au SIDA démontrent bien l'impact émotionnel des pertes occasionnées par cette maladie fatale sur les personnes atteintes. Celles-ci éprouvent des sentiments intenses d'anxiété, de peur, de colère, d'impuissance et de désespoir. À cette détresse psychologique s'ajoute l'isolement des victimes. La réaction négative entretenue au sein de la société à l'égard du SIDA contribue à discriminer et stigmatiser les victimes de cette maladie. Le SIDA est en quelque sorte un drame personnel et un effondrement de la vie familiale et sociale. Les répercussions psychosociales de cette maladie exigent des stratégies d'intervention et de recherche appropriées aux divers problèmes soulevés par le syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".