MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297791836 · doi:10.7202/600868ar

L’analyse spatiale d’une matrice de migration interne

2008· article· fr· W4297791836 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michel Poulain

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesAttractionArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’application à des données canadiennes d’une méthode d’analyse des courants migratoires mise au point par l’auteur est ici analysée. Le calcul de différences pondérées entre matrices de courants migratoires observés et attendus permet d’établir l’évolution, de 1956 à 1976, du niveau d’attraction ou de répulsion de six provinces canadiennes, du niveau de la mobilité spatiale et du niveau d’attraction-répulsion. L’auteur montre l’impact de la distance géographique sur la migration; il fait ainsi ressortir l’attraction des provinces de l’ouest. Enfin le regroupement des provinces où les échanges sont les plus forts met en évidence la régionalisation du pays où le Québec se détache de l’ensemble des provinces anglophones

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207