Economic restructuring in resource-dependent communities in the aftermath of mill/mine closure: A comparative case study of Valemount and Tumbler Ridge in northern British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond the devastating effects on a community, deindustrialization can present an opportunity for change by highlighting the perilous effect of over-dependence on a single industry and motivating local stakeholders to enact change by building social capital and cohesion as well as engaging in local economic development. In small, historically resource-dependent communities, de-industrialization has shifted the focus from staples-based development to a more diverse economy rooted in place-based development. At the same time, the shift from FordistKeynesianism toward Post-Fordist Neoliberalism has limited companies’ obligations toward resource towns as they work through these transitions. Focusing on the case studies of Valemount and Tumbler Ridge, this thesis draws upon a comparative case study approach, key informant interviews, and analysis of documents for a deeper understanding of the processes, strategies, and outcomes regarding this transition. The thesis offers the following findings: First, the shift from a single industry to a diversified economy provides a clear case of a transition towards place-based development. Second, the emerging place-based development trajectory emphasizes the importance of local empowerment and management, strategic investments, social capital/cohesion, local capacity and planning, and government support in transitioning resource towns. Third, the shift from Fordist-Keynesianism to Post-Fordist Neoliberalism has resulted in retrenchment in corporate community development. Additionally, these findings support policy coordination to scale-up social and economic infrastructure, service support, and resources to help maintain place competitiveness and adaptability to future changes. Community transition must be restructured according to local context and needs. Integrating social impact mitigation into the existing BC Environmental Mitigation Policy and permitting process will help foster community sustainability and economic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".