MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297852393 · doi:10.1101/2022.09.07.507010

Accelerated ensemble generation for cyclic peptides using a Reservoir-REMD implementation in GROMACS

2022· preprint· en· W4297852393 on OpenAlexaff
Shawn C. C. Hsueh, Adekunle Aina, Steven S. Plotkin

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGenome British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclic peptideChemistryMolecular dynamicsPeptideComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cyclic peptides naturally occur as antibiotics, fungicides, and immunosuppressants, and have been adapted for use as potential therapeutics. Scaffolded cyclic peptide antigens have many protein characteristics such as reduced toxicity, increased stability over linear peptides, and conformational selectivity, but with fewer amino acids than whole proteins. The profile of shapes presented by a cyclic peptide modulates its therapeutic efficacy, and is represented by the ensemble of its sampled conformations. Although some algorithms excel in creating a diverse ensemble of cyclic peptide conformations, they seldom address the entropic contribution of flexible conformations, and they often have significant practical difficulty producing an ensemble with converged and reliable thermodynamic properties. In this study, an accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) method, reservoir replica exchange MD (R-REMD or Res-REMD), was implemented in GROMACS-4.6.7, and benchmarked on three small cyclic peptide model systems: a cyclized segment of A β (cyclo-(CGHHQKLVG)), a cyclized furin cleavage site of SARS-CoV-2 spike (cyclo-(CGPRRARSG)), and oxytocin (disulfide bonded CY-IQNCPLG). Additionally, we also benchmarked Res-REMD on Alanine dipeptide and Trpzip2 to demonstrate its validity and efficiency over REMD. Compared to REMD, Res-REMD significantly accelerated the ensemble generation of cyclo-(CGHHQKLVG), but not cyclo-(CGPRRARSG) or oxytocin. This difference is due to the longer auto-correlation time of torsional angles in cyclo-(CGHHQKLVG) v s. the latter two cyclic peptide systems; The randomly seeded reservoir in Res-REMD thus accelerates sampling and convergence. The auto-correlation time of the torsional angles can thus be used to determine whether Res-REMD is preferable to REMD for cyclic peptides. We provide a github page with modified GROMACS source code for running Res-REMD at https://github.com/PlotkinLab/Reservoir-REMD .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207